Any Pregnancy Alleged To Be Caused By Force Is Rape: SC
Sep 29, 2022 | Pratirodh Bureau
Justice Divyesh Joshi observed that the actual incidences of violence against women in India are probably much higher than the data suggests and that women may continue to face hostility and remain in environments where they are subject to violence
The Supreme Court on Thursday said that forceful pregnancy of a married woman can be treated as “marital rape” for the purposes of abortion. In a landmark ruling on women’s reproductive rights and bodily autonomy, a bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud said, “Any pregnancy alleged to be caused by force by a pregnant woman is rape.”
The bench, which also included Justices AS Bopanna and JB Pardiwala, said that marital rape has to be considered as falling within the meaning of ‘rape’ for the purpose of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act and Rules and in order to save women from forceful pregnancy.
“Married women may also form the part of the class of survivors of sexual assault or rape. The ordinary meaning of the word rape is sexual intercourse with a person without consent or against their will. Regardless of whether such forced intercourse occurs in the context of matrimony, a woman may become pregnant as a result of non-consensual sexual intercourse performed upon her by her husband,” said the bench.
Pronouncing the judgement the bench said, “We would be remiss in not recognising that intimate partner violence is the reality and can take the form of rape. The misconception that strangers are exclusively or almost exclusively responsible for sex and gender-based violence is a deeply regrettable one. Sex and gender-based violence in all its form in the context of the family have long formed a part of the lived experiences of women.”
Though the apex court is yet to adjudicate the marital rape issue, the comments from the bench on marital rape for the purpose of unwanted pregnancy may pave the way for later judgment on the issue.
It also held that a woman need not prove the commission of rape or sexual assault to seek termination of pregnancy under the MTP Act. The top court also held that the marital status of a woman can’t be ground to deprive her right to abort unwanted pregnancy.
Interpreting the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, the Supreme Court said that whether single and unmarried, all women have the right to abort under MTP Act and Rules till 24 weeks of pregnancy.
The upper limit for the termination of pregnancy is 24 weeks for married women, special categories — including survivors of rape and other vulnerable women such as the differently-abled and minors; the corresponding window for unmarried women in consensual relationships is 20 weeks.
The rights of reproductive autonomy give unmarried women similar rights as married women, the bench held.
Holding that all women are entitled to safe and legal abortion, the top court said the distinction between married and unmarried woman for the purposes of the MTP Act is “artificial and constitutionally unsustainable” and perpetuates the stereotype that only married women indulge in sexual activities.
“Law cannot create such artificial classification based on narrow grounds… the decision to carry a pregnancy to full term or to abort it lies in reproductive autonomy of a woman, which is rooted in bodily autonomy. Depriving her of this right will be an affront to a woman’s right to dignity,” the bench held in its ruling.
The verdict of the apex court came on a petition filed by a 25-year-old single woman, whose plea for termination of her 24-week pregnancy was denied by the Delhi High Court, but the Supreme Court allowed her to abort the foetus if there was no risk to her life.
Earlier, the apex court had questioned if a married woman is allowed to terminate up to 24 weeks of pregnancy under the MTP Act and Rules framed under it, why deny the same to unmarried women, even though the risk is the same for both.
The woman had approached the apex court after the Delhi High Court declined to grant permission to abort her pregnancy which had arisen out of a consensual sexual relationship, saying that it virtually amounts to killing the foetus.
The High Court on July 15 said that permitting abortion at this stage would virtually amount to killing the foetus and asked the woman to rather put up her child for adoption.