Skip to content
Hindi News, हिंदी समाचार, Samachar, Breaking News, Latest Khabar – Pratirodh

Hindi News, हिंदी समाचार, Samachar, Breaking News, Latest Khabar – Pratirodh

Primary Menu Hindi News, हिंदी समाचार, Samachar, Breaking News, Latest Khabar – Pratirodh

Hindi News, हिंदी समाचार, Samachar, Breaking News, Latest Khabar – Pratirodh

  • Home
  • Newswires
  • Politics & Society
  • The New Feudals
  • World View
  • Arts And Aesthetics
  • For The Record
  • About Us
  • Featured

Delhi HC’s Split Verdict On Criminalisation Of Marital Rape

May 11, 2022 | Pratirodh Bureau

The Supreme Court said that forceful pregnancy of a married woman can be treated as "marital rape" for the purposes of abortion

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday delivered a split verdict on the issue of criminalisation of marital rape. One of the justices favoured striking down the provision, but the other held it was not unconstitutional.

The division bench granted leave to the parties to file an appeal before the Supreme Court.

While Justice Rajiv Shakdher, who headed the division bench, favoured striking down the marital rape exception, Justice C. Hari Shankar said the exception under the IPC is not unconstitutional and was based on an intelligible differentia.

The petitioners had challenged the constitutionality of the marital rape exception under Section 375 IPC (rape) on the ground that it discriminated against married women who are sexually assaulted by their husbands.

Under the exception given in Section 375 of the IPC, sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his wife, the wife not being minor, does not constitute rape.

While delivering the verdict, Justice Shakdher said “as far as I am concerned, the impugned provisions — exception 2 to section 375 and section 376 (E) — are violative of Articles 14, 15, 19(1) (A) and 21 of the Constitution and are hence struck down.”

He said this declaration will operate from the date of its pronouncement.

However, Justice Shankar said “I have not been able to agree with my learned brother” and added that these provisions do not violate Articles 14, 19 (1) (A), and 21 of the Constitution.

He said the courts cannot substitute their subjective value judgement for the view of the democratically elected legislature and the exception is based on an intelligible differentia.

He said the challenge to the provisions by the petitioners cannot sustain.

In February, the Centre had urged the court to grant more time to enable it to state its stand on the issue after a consultative process.

The request was, however, turned down by the bench on the ground that it was not possible to defer an ongoing matter endlessly.

In a 2017 affidavit, the Centre had opposed the pleas, saying that marital rape cannot be made a criminal offence as it could become a phenomenon that may destabilise the institution of marriage and an easy tool for harassing husbands.

Tags: Delhi High Court, marital rape, Pratirodh

Continue Reading

Previous Singapore Bans ‘The Kashmir Files’, Says It Can Cause Enmity: Reports
Next Supreme Court Puts Sedition Law On Hold

More Stories

  • Featured

Indian Economy Yet To Revive From Effects Of Pandemic: CPI (M)

3 hours ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

New Pipelines Will Fragment Assam’s Protected Forests: Environmentalists

3 hours ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

The Role Of Urban Foraging In Building Climate-Resilient Food Systems

17 hours ago Pratirodh Bureau

Recent Posts

  • Indian Economy Yet To Revive From Effects Of Pandemic: CPI (M)
  • New Pipelines Will Fragment Assam’s Protected Forests: Environmentalists
  • The Role Of Urban Foraging In Building Climate-Resilient Food Systems
  • Now, A ‘Private’ Sainik School Linked To RSS?
  • About 3,000 Tech Employees Being Fired A Day On Average In Jan
  • War Veteran Doctor, ‘Rasna’ Creator Are Among Padma Awardees
  • Black Days Ahead If Coal City Doesn’t Change
  • US Firm Alleges ‘Brazen’ Fraud By Adani, Who Calls It Malicious
  • Why Ukraine War Today Is So Different From A Year Ago
  • No Screening Of BBC Docu At JNU As Power, Internet Cut
  • Shielding The Hijol From Climate Impacts
  • Bilkis Bano’s Plea Against Convicts’ Remission Could Not Be Heard In SC
  • NDRF To Station Permanent Teams In Hills For Rescue Operations
  • Thousands Of Indian IT Professionals Jobless In The US
  • How Solar-Powered Refrigerators Slow Down Climate Change
  • Compensation For Crop Loss: Landless, Tenant Farmers Miss Out
  • Peru Closes Machu Picchu As Anti-Government Protests Grow
  • There Was No Need To Scrap Article 370: Dulat
  • RSS Ideology And Netaji’s Ideals Poles Apart: Anita Bose-Pfaff
  • UN Sorry For Photo Of Its Personnel In Front Of Taliban Flag

Search

Main Links

  • Home
  • Newswires
  • Politics & Society
  • The New Feudals
  • World View
  • Arts And Aesthetics
  • For The Record
  • About Us

Related Stroy

  • Featured

Indian Economy Yet To Revive From Effects Of Pandemic: CPI (M)

3 hours ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

New Pipelines Will Fragment Assam’s Protected Forests: Environmentalists

3 hours ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

The Role Of Urban Foraging In Building Climate-Resilient Food Systems

17 hours ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

Now, A ‘Private’ Sainik School Linked To RSS?

23 hours ago Shalini
  • Featured

About 3,000 Tech Employees Being Fired A Day On Average In Jan

1 day ago Pratirodh Bureau

Recent Posts

  • Indian Economy Yet To Revive From Effects Of Pandemic: CPI (M)
  • New Pipelines Will Fragment Assam’s Protected Forests: Environmentalists
  • The Role Of Urban Foraging In Building Climate-Resilient Food Systems
  • Now, A ‘Private’ Sainik School Linked To RSS?
  • About 3,000 Tech Employees Being Fired A Day On Average In Jan
Copyright © All rights reserved. | CoverNews by AF themes.