Skip to content
Hindi News, हिंदी समाचार, Samachar, Breaking News, Latest Khabar – Pratirodh

Hindi News, हिंदी समाचार, Samachar, Breaking News, Latest Khabar – Pratirodh

Primary Menu Hindi News, हिंदी समाचार, Samachar, Breaking News, Latest Khabar – Pratirodh

Hindi News, हिंदी समाचार, Samachar, Breaking News, Latest Khabar – Pratirodh

  • Home
  • Newswires
  • Politics & Society
  • The New Feudals
  • World View
  • Arts And Aesthetics
  • For The Record
  • About Us
  • Featured

Dissent Can’t Be Termed Seditious: Supreme Court

Mar 3, 2021 | Pratirodh Bureau

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh, on Thursday, said that the Supreme Court has set up a seven-judge bench headed by CJI Chandrachud to hear petitions filed by him challenging the unconstitutional manner in which the Modi government has passed key bills by getting them declared as Money Bills (Representational Image)

Observing that expression of views that are different from the opinion of the government cannot be termed as seditious, the Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a PIL seeking action against National Conference president Farooq Abdullah over his comments on abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hemant Gupta rejected the plea and also imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on the petitioners for making such claims.

“Expression of views which are different from the opinion of the government cannot be termed as seditious,” the bench observed.

The top court was hearing a plea that referred to his statement on restoring Article 370, which gave special status to Jammu and Kashmir, and contended it clearly amounts to a seditious act and therefore he is liable to be punished under section 124-A of the IPC.

The petition filed by Rajat Sharma and Dr Neh Srivastava, both belonging to an organisation Vishwa Guru India Vision of Sardar Patel, alleged that the former chief minister is trying to “hand over” Kashmir to China and thus, he should be prosecuted for sedition.

“Mr Farooq Abdullah has committed an offence punishable under section 124-A of Indian Penal Code. As he has made the live statement that for restoring Article 370 he would take help of China which clearly amount to seditious act and therefore he is liable to be punished under section 124-A of the IPC,” the plea said.

The petitioners also referred to a statement made by BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra to claim that Abdullah is misleading the people of Jammu and Kashmir to join China for the restoration of Article 370 of the Constitution.

The Central Government had scrapped the special status granted to J&K under Article 370 on August 5, 2019, and divided the state into two Union Territories – Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh – with effect from October 31, 2019.

After the scrapping of Article 370, senior J&K leaders, including Farooq Abdullah, his son Omar Abdullah and PDP supremo and former CM Mehbooba Mufti, were put under house arrest.

Tags: article 370, Farooq Abdullah, Jammu and Kashmir, Pratirodh, sedition, Supreme Court

Continue Reading

Previous U.S., EU Impose Sanctions On Russia For Navalny Poisoning, Jailing
Next Amazon Issues Rare Apology After Complaints Over ‘Tandav’

More Stories

  • Featured

Delhi’s Toxic Air Rises, So Does The Crackdown On Protesters

1 week ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

A Celebration of Philately Leaves Its Stamp On Enthusiasts In MP

1 week ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

Groundwater Management In South Asia Must Put Farmers First

1 week ago Pratirodh Bureau

Recent Posts

  • Delhi’s Toxic Air Rises, So Does The Crackdown On Protesters
  • A Celebration of Philately Leaves Its Stamp On Enthusiasts In MP
  • Groundwater Management In South Asia Must Put Farmers First
  • What The Sheikh Hasina Verdict Reveals About Misogyny In South Asia
  • Documentaries Rooted In Land, Water & Culture Shine At DIFF
  • Electoral Roll Revision Is Sparking Widespread Social Anxieties
  • Over 100 Journalists Call Sheikh Hasina Verdict ‘Biased’, ‘Non-Transparent’
  • Belém’s Streets Turn Red, Black And Green As People March For Climate Justice
  • Shark Confusion Leaves Fishers In Tamil Nadu Fearing Penalties
  • ‘Nitish Kumar Would Win Only 25 Seats Without Rs 10k Transfers’
  • Saalumarada Thimmakka, Mother Of Trees, Has Died, Aged 114
  • Now, A Radical New Proposal To Raise Finance For Climate Damages
  • ‘Congress Will Fight SIR Legally, Politically And Organisationally’
  • COP30 Summit Confronts Gap Between Finance Goals And Reality
  • Ethiopia Famine: Using Starvation As A Weapon Of War
  • Opposition Leaders Unleash Fury Over Alleged Electoral Fraud in Bihar
  • In AP And Beyond, Solar-Powered Cold Storage Is Empowering Farmers
  • The Plot Twists Involving The Politics Of A River (Book Review)
  • Red Fort Blast: Congress Demands Resignation Of Amit Shah
  • Here’s Why Tackling Climate Disinformation Is On The COP30 Agenda

Search

Main Links

  • Home
  • Newswires
  • Politics & Society
  • The New Feudals
  • World View
  • Arts And Aesthetics
  • For The Record
  • About Us

Related Stroy

  • Featured

Delhi’s Toxic Air Rises, So Does The Crackdown On Protesters

1 week ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

A Celebration of Philately Leaves Its Stamp On Enthusiasts In MP

1 week ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

Groundwater Management In South Asia Must Put Farmers First

1 week ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

What The Sheikh Hasina Verdict Reveals About Misogyny In South Asia

2 weeks ago Shalini
  • Featured

Documentaries Rooted In Land, Water & Culture Shine At DIFF

2 weeks ago Pratirodh Bureau

Recent Posts

  • Delhi’s Toxic Air Rises, So Does The Crackdown On Protesters
  • A Celebration of Philately Leaves Its Stamp On Enthusiasts In MP
  • Groundwater Management In South Asia Must Put Farmers First
  • What The Sheikh Hasina Verdict Reveals About Misogyny In South Asia
  • Documentaries Rooted In Land, Water & Culture Shine At DIFF
Copyright © All rights reserved. | CoverNews by AF themes.