Skip to content
Hindi News, हिंदी समाचार, Samachar, Breaking News, Latest Khabar – Pratirodh

Hindi News, हिंदी समाचार, Samachar, Breaking News, Latest Khabar – Pratirodh

Primary Menu Hindi News, हिंदी समाचार, Samachar, Breaking News, Latest Khabar – Pratirodh

Hindi News, हिंदी समाचार, Samachar, Breaking News, Latest Khabar – Pratirodh

  • Home
  • Newswires
  • Politics & Society
  • The New Feudals
  • World View
  • Arts And Aesthetics
  • For The Record
  • About Us
  • Featured

Section Of Media Gives Communal Colour To News: SC

Sep 2, 2021 | Pratirodh Bureau

FILE PHOTO: Television journalists are seen outside the premises of the Supreme Court in New Delhi. The Supreme Court on Friday said it will not injunct media on carrying news on the Hindenburg report on the Adani group

A section of the media gives communal colour to news, bringing a bad name to the country, the Supreme Court rued on Thursday, expressing serious concern over fake news on social media, including web portals and YouTube, which listen only to “the powerful voices” and not judges and institutions.

The strong observations of the bench headed by Chief Justice NV Ramana came while hearing a batch of petitions, including the one filed by Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind, seeking directions to the Centre to stop dissemination of “fake news” related to last year’s religious gathering at Nizamuddin Markaz and take strict action against those responsible for it.

“The problem is, everything in this country is shown with a communal angle by a section of media. The country is going to get a bad name ultimately,” said the bench, adding, “Did you (the Centre) ever attempt to regulate these private channels?”

The bench also agreed to hear after six weeks the Centre’s plea seeking transfer of petitions to the apex court that are pending in High Courts against the validity of new Information Technology Rules, which aim to regulate online content.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, said, “Not only communal but also planted news” is there and the IT Rules had been framed to regulate content online, including web portals.

The social media listens only to “the powerful voices” and several things are written against judges, institutions without any accountability, said the bench, which also comprised Justices Surya Kant and AS Bopanna.

Speaking for the bench, CJI Ramana said, “I have not come across where these social media, Twitter and Facebook, respond to common people. They never respond. There is no accountability. About the institutions, they have written badly and they do not respond and say that this is their right. They only worry about powerful men and not judges, institutions or common man. That is what we have seen. This is our experience.”

He further said: “There is no control over fake news and slandering in web portals and YouTube channels. If you go to YouTube, you will find how fake news is freely circulated and anyone can start a channel on YouTube.”

The top court permitted Jamiat to amend its petition and serve it within four weeks to the Centre through the Solicitor General, who may file the response in two weeks thereafter. (PTI)

Tags: fake news, Information Technology Rules, Pratirodh, Supreme Court

Continue Reading

Previous As Afghanistan Adjusts To Taliban Rule, Music Goes Silent
Next World United In What Taliban Should Do For Recognition: WH

More Stories

  • Featured

‘Bidhuri Made Mockery Of PM’s Sabka Saath, Sabka Vishwas Remarks’

20 hours ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

Why This Indian State Has A Policy To Prioritise Pedestrians

23 hours ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

The Reasons Why Humans Cannot Trust AI

23 hours ago Pratirodh Bureau

Recent Posts

  • ‘Bidhuri Made Mockery Of PM’s Sabka Saath, Sabka Vishwas Remarks’
  • Why This Indian State Has A Policy To Prioritise Pedestrians
  • The Reasons Why Humans Cannot Trust AI
  • Is Pursuing The ‘Liberal Arts’ A Luxury Today?
  • The Curious Case Of The Killings In Canada
  • Shocking! Excavating Farmlands For Highways
  • Health Must Be Fast-Tracked For 2030
  • What Are ‘Planetary Boundaries’ & Why Should We Care?
  • Ramesh Reminds Shah Of Gujarat’s ‘Reality’
  • Why Are Intense Storms, Erratic Rainfall Events More Frequent Now?
  • Coal-fired Contradictions: Why Climate Action Needs A Circuit Breaker
  • Solar-Powered Looms Boost Income And Safety For Silk Weavers
  • ‘Govt Intention Something Else, Publicising Bill In View Of Polls’
  • A Probe Finds The UN Is Not Carbon Neutral
  • Empowering Teachers Is Key To A Sustainable Future
  • Genocide Fears In Sudan Attract Little Attention
  • Disaster Resilience In The Built Environment
  • “Unite And Overthrow Dictatorial Govt To Save Democracy”
  • NASA Report Finds No Evidence That UFOs Are Extraterrestrial
  • Why Locals Are Resisting Small Hydro Projects In Darjeeling

Search

Main Links

  • Home
  • Newswires
  • Politics & Society
  • The New Feudals
  • World View
  • Arts And Aesthetics
  • For The Record
  • About Us

Related Stroy

  • Featured

‘Bidhuri Made Mockery Of PM’s Sabka Saath, Sabka Vishwas Remarks’

20 hours ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

Why This Indian State Has A Policy To Prioritise Pedestrians

23 hours ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

The Reasons Why Humans Cannot Trust AI

23 hours ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

Is Pursuing The ‘Liberal Arts’ A Luxury Today?

24 hours ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

The Curious Case Of The Killings In Canada

2 days ago Shalini

Recent Posts

  • ‘Bidhuri Made Mockery Of PM’s Sabka Saath, Sabka Vishwas Remarks’
  • Why This Indian State Has A Policy To Prioritise Pedestrians
  • The Reasons Why Humans Cannot Trust AI
  • Is Pursuing The ‘Liberal Arts’ A Luxury Today?
  • The Curious Case Of The Killings In Canada
Copyright © All rights reserved. | CoverNews by AF themes.