The plea in the SC said Bihar is the only state which has been providing two days of special menstrual pain leave to women since 1992. It said there are some Indian companies that offer paid period leaves (Representational Image)
In a major development which is likely to have far-reaching consequences, the Supreme Court on Wednesday urged the Centre and state governments to refrain from registering any FIRs invoking the sedition provision, Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, till review of the law by the Centre is complete.
A bench headed by Chief Justice N.V. Ramana and comprising Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli said till the review of the sedition provision by the Centre is complete, the governments should not use the sedition provision.
In an interim order, the bench said no new FIRs should be lodged under the sedition provision and those already in jail can approach courts for relief.
The Centre proposed issuing an advisory to the state governments that only a police officer of the rank of Superintendent of Police (SP) may record in writing the reasons for a case involving sedition provision (Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code) as it cannot prevent police from registering a cognizable offence under sedition provision.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, submitted that the government proposes that a police officer of the level of SP or above should decide, for now, on whether a sedition charge should be filed in future FIRs. He added that as the government reviews the sedition law, pending sedition cases can be reviewed, and the courts can decide on the bail application of those under Section 124A IPC, expeditiously.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing one of the petitioners, contended that Section 124A has become prima facie unconstitutional and the apex court must stay application of the sedition provision, till the Centre reviews the provision.
On Tuesday, the top court had sought the Centre’s response on pending and future cases registered under the sedition law.
The Ministry of Home Affairs, in its affidavit, said the Prime Minister of India has been cognizant of various views expressed on the subject and has also periodically, in various forums, expressed his clear and unequivocal views in favour of protection of civil liberties and respect for human rights.
The Home Ministry added that the Prime Minister has repeatedly said that one of India’s strengths is the diverse thought streams that beautifully flourish in the country. The ministry said the Prime Minister believes that at a time when the nation is marking Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav (75 years of Independence), it is essential to work harder to shed colonial baggage that is past its utility, which includes outdated colonial laws and practices.
“The Government of India, being fully cognizant of various views being expressed on the subject of sedition and also having considered the concerns of civil liberties and human rights, while committed to maintain and protect the sovereignty and integrity of this nation, has decided to re-examine and re-consider the provisions of Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, which can only be done before the competent forum,” said the affidavit. (IANS)
Kashmir, the world’s second-largest producer of saffron has faced a decline in saffron cultivation over the past two decades. Some…
The Church of the Holy Sepulchre, Christianity’s holiest shrine in the world, is an unlikely place to lose yourself in…
The debate over the future relationship between news and social media is bringing us closer to a long-overdue reckoning. Social…
On Sunday, May 5, Congress leader Supriya Shrinate claimed that PM Narendra Modi was reading from his 2019 script for…
As I write, the grim count of journalists killed in Gaza since last October has reached 97. Reporters Without Borders…
December 30, 2022, was a day to forget for India’s already badly mauled and tamed media. For, that day, influential…
This website uses cookies.