No ‘5-Star’ Covid Centre For Justices: Delhi Govt Tells HC
FILE PHOTO: The Delhi High Court said National Sports Federations should foster and identify the best talent and not get muddled by hyper-technicality and personal vendettas
The Delhi government on Thursday informed the Delhi High Court that it has withdrawn the order to create COVID-19 facilities for justices, staff and their families in a five-star hotel.
A bench of Justices Vipin Sanghi and Rekha Palli took on record the latest order passed by the government and disposed of the suo motu petition initiated by the court on April 27.
The High Court had taken cognisance of the news reports that said that 100 rooms of Ashoka Hotel in the national capital have been converted into a COVID-19 health facility for justices of Delhi High Court on its request.
The High Court said no communication of this kind was made to anyone in this regard.
At the outset, Delhi government standing counsel Santosh K. Tripathi informed the bench that the April 25 order, requisitioning 100 rooms of the hotel for setting up COVID-19 facilities for justices and their families, has been withdrawn with immediate effect.
On April 27, the High Court had said it cannot ask for creating such facility, which is going to be discriminatory, and the SDM’s order in this regard was very misleading.
“This is very very misleading. The High Court has not made any such request for setting up beds in any such five-star hotel,” the bench had said and added that the order passed by the sub-divisional magistrate was wrong, as the state cannot create a facility exclusively for a class.
It had said when the Delhi government was unable to provide oxygen to everybody, it was talking of providing a 100-bed facility for the High Court justices.
In an order issued by the sub-divisional magistrate (SDM) of Chanakyapuri on April 25, it was stated that the COVID-19 facility at Ashoka Hotel will be associated with Primus Hospital.
The court had said it only had a meeting to discuss the situation in the subordinate judiciary where judges had to hold court in person and many of them, including their families, were infected by COVID-19.
“We lost two judicial officers to COVID-19,” the bench said and added that in such a situation it only wanted that if these judicial officers wanted admission in a hospital, then some facility should be available to them.
“That has been translated into this kind of order. As if we wanted a facility for ourselves. Where is the question of our having a 100-bed facility?” the court had said.
