Nirbhaya Case: SC Junks Curative Pleas Of 2 Convicts

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the curative petitions filed by two of the four death row convicts in the 2012 Nirbhaya gangrape and murder case.

A 5-judge bench headed by Justice N V Ramana rejected the curative petitions filed by Vinay Sharma (26) and Mukesh Kumar (32).

The proceedings were conducted in-chamber. A curative petition is the last and final legal remedy available to a person.

The five judges were unanimous that there was no merit in the curative petitions filed by the two condemned petitioners.

“The applications for stay of execution of death sentence are also rejected. We have gone through the Curative Petitions and the relevant documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Another, reported in 2002 (4) SCC 388. Hence, the Curative Petitions are dismissed,” the bench said.

The other members of the bench were Justices Arun Mishra, R F Nariman, R Banumathi and Ashok Bhushan.

Vinay and Mukesh had filed curative petitions on January 9.

A Delhi court had on January 7 issued death warrants against the four convicts and said they would be hanged on January 22 at 7 am in Tihar jail.

Two other death-row convicts, Akshay Kumar Singh (31) and Pawan Gupta (25), had not filed curative petitions.

A 23-year-old paramedic student, referred to as Nirbhaya, was gang-raped and brutally assaulted on the intervening night of December 16-17, 2012, in a moving bus in south Delhi by six people before being thrown out on the road. She died on December 29 at Mount Elizabeth Hospital in Singapore.

The Supreme Court had in 2017 upheld the capital punishment awarded to them by the Delhi High Court and a trial court.

One of the six accused in the case, Ram Singh, allegedly committed suicide in Tihar Jail.

A juvenile, who was among the accused, was convicted by a juvenile justice board and was released from a reformation home after serving a three-year term.

On July 9, 2018, the apex court had dismissed the review pleas filed by three of the convicts in the case, saying no grounds had been made out by them for review of the 2017 verdict.

Recent Posts

  • Featured

Delhi’s Dilemma: A Growing Economy, Growing Unemployment

India is on its way to becoming the third-largest economy in the world, yet unemployment among young people with graduate…

3 hours ago
  • Featured

Just 8% Of Women Candidates In First 2 Phases Of Lok Sabha Polls

In the first two phases of the Lok Sabha polls, women constituted only eight per cent of the total 1,618…

5 hours ago
  • Featured

A Job In A Warzone Or Unemployment At Home

Indian diplomatic missions need to closely monitor the security situation and assess the threat perceptions to its communities. Nation-making is…

5 hours ago
  • Featured

Nature Conservation Works And We’re Getting Better At It

To work in nature conservation is to battle a headwind of bad news. When the overwhelming picture indicates the natural…

1 day ago
  • Featured

The Challenges Of AI Weather Forecasting

Amid the surge of extreme weather events globally, billions of dollars are pouring into developing cutting-edge weather forecasting models based…

1 day ago
  • Featured

PM Modi Is Scared, He May Even Shed Tears On Stage: Rahul Gandhi

On Friday, April 26, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi retaliated against Prime Minister Narendra Modi over his attack on the grand…

2 days ago

This website uses cookies.