‘FB Went Soft On Bajrang Dal To Protect Business, Staff’

Despite being tagged by Facebook’s security team as a potentially dangerous organisation that supports violence against minorities across India, the Bajrang Dal has been allowed to thrive on the social network out of political and safety considerations, The Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday.

Facebook has dithered on acting against the right-wing group with ties to the ruling BJP because “cracking down on Bajrang Dal might endanger both the company’s business prospects and its staff in India”, the newspaper wrote, reaffirming its reportage earlier this year on the subject.

In August, the Journal had reported on an alleged bias in Facebook’s policies that favoured the ruling BJP out of business interests and said former Facebook executive Ankhi Das lobbied in favour of a leader of the ruling party who made anti-Muslim comments.

Facebook, which banned the politician just days after the report was published, denied the most egregious of charges but admitted that it had to do better to curb hate speech. Ms Das stepped down from the company soon after.

The latest report by The Wall Street Journal cited Facebook’s actions surrounding a video by the Bajrang Dal which claimed responsibility for an attack on a church outside New Delhi in June that has been allowed to collect 2.5 lakh views.

“Besides risking infuriating India’s ruling Hindu nationalist politicians, banning Bajrang Dal might precipitate physical attacks against Facebook personnel or facilities,” an internal Facebook report said, according to the newspaper.

“A group of Facebook’s employees said in an internal letter and posts on Facebook discussion groups that the presence of Bajrang Dal on its platform, among other organisations, casts doubt on the company’s commitment to tackle hate speech in India,” it said.

Responding to the article, Facebook spokesperson Andy Stone told the Journal, “We enforce our Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy globally without regard to political position or party affiliation.”

In October, Facebook, which has pumped billions of dollars in India, runs five offices in the country and counts it as its biggest market in terms of users, defended itself in front of a parliamentary committee against allegations of bias and concerns about protecting user data.

Recent Posts

  • Featured

Kashmir: Indoor Saffron Farming Offers Hope Amid Declining Production

Kashmir, the world’s second-largest producer of saffron has faced a decline in saffron cultivation over the past two decades. Some…

20 hours ago
  • Featured

Pilgrim’s Progress: Keeping Workers Safe In The Holy Land

The Church of the Holy Sepulchre, Christianity’s holiest shrine in the world, is an unlikely place to lose yourself in…

22 hours ago
  • Featured

How Advertising And Not Social Media, Killed Traditional Journalism

The debate over the future relationship between news and social media is bringing us closer to a long-overdue reckoning. Social…

23 hours ago
  • Featured

PM Modi Reading From 2014 Script, Misleading People: Shrinate

On Sunday, May 5, Congress leader Supriya Shrinate claimed that PM Narendra Modi was reading from his 2019 script for…

23 hours ago
  • Featured

Killing Journalists Cannot Kill The Truth

As I write, the grim count of journalists killed in Gaza since last October has reached 97. Reporters Without Borders…

2 days ago
  • Featured

The Corporate Takeover Of India’s Media

December 30, 2022, was a day to forget for India’s already badly mauled and tamed media. For, that day, influential…

2 days ago

This website uses cookies.