‘Education Not Business To Earn Profit From’

(Source: PTI)

Education is not a business to earn profit from and tuition fees shall always be affordable, the Supreme Court has said while upholding the Andhra Pradesh High Court order quashing the state government’s decision to enhance the tuition fee in medical colleges to Rs 24 lakh per annum.

A bench of Justices M R Shah and Sudhanshu Dhulia imposed a cost of Rs 5 lakh on the petitioner, Narayana Medical College, and Andhra Pradesh to be deposited with the court registry within a period of six weeks.

“To enhance the fee to Rs 24 lakh per annum i.e., seven times more than the fee fixed earlier was not justifiable at all. Education is not the business to earn profit. The tuition fee shall always be affordable,” the bench said.

The top court’s observation came while dismissing a plea filed by the college against an order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court which set aside the government’s decision to enhance the tuition fee of MBBS students.

The high court had held that considering the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee (for Professional Courses offered in Private Un-Aided Professional Institutions) Rules, 2006, the fee cannot be enhanced/fixed without the recommendations/report of the committee.

The top court said several factors such as the location of the professional institution, nature of the professional course, cost of available infrastructure are required to be considered by the Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee while determining or reviewing the tuition fees.

It said the college management cannot be permitted to retain the amount recovered/collected pursuant to the illegal government order.

“In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, both the appeals fail and the same deserve to be dismissed and are accordingly dismissed, however, with cost which is quantified at Rs 5 lakh to be equally paid by the appellant as well as the State of Andhra Pradesh to be deposited with the Registry of this Court within a period of six weeks,” the bench said.

Recent Posts

  • Featured

PM Modi Is Scared, He May Even Shed Tears On Stage: Rahul Gandhi

On Friday, April 26, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi retaliated against Prime Minister Narendra Modi over his attack on the grand…

20 hours ago
  • Featured

Climate Change Poses Dire Health And Human Rights Risks

Climate change has not traditionally been seen as a health and human rights concern — but that may be changing…

21 hours ago
  • Featured

Tech To Decrease Food Loss & Increase Farmer Incomes

Food loss after harvest has economic implications for the farmer and also impacts the environment due to loss of agricultural…

24 hours ago
  • Featured

E-Bikes Could Cut Smog, Congestion & Energy Use — But Will They?

The global market for e-bikes is surging. These bicycles, usually equipped with pedals and an electric motor assist, are popular…

2 days ago
  • Featured

Difference In Environmental Footprints Between Economic Strata

A new study that analysed consumption data in India found stark differences in the water, particulate matter and carbon footprints…

2 days ago
  • Featured

How Climate Change Is Killing Us, In More Ways Than One

We’ve all heard about climate change’s effect on our planet — but do you know about the many ways it…

4 days ago

This website uses cookies.