Skip to content
Hindi News, हिंदी समाचार, Samachar, Breaking News, Latest Khabar – Pratirodh

Hindi News, हिंदी समाचार, Samachar, Breaking News, Latest Khabar – Pratirodh

Primary Menu Hindi News, हिंदी समाचार, Samachar, Breaking News, Latest Khabar – Pratirodh

Hindi News, हिंदी समाचार, Samachar, Breaking News, Latest Khabar – Pratirodh

  • Home
  • Newswires
  • Politics & Society
  • The New Feudals
  • World View
  • Arts And Aesthetics
  • For The Record
  • About Us
  • Featured

Dissent Can’t Be Termed Seditious: Supreme Court

Mar 3, 2021 | Pratirodh Bureau

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh, on Thursday, said that the Supreme Court has set up a seven-judge bench headed by CJI Chandrachud to hear petitions filed by him challenging the unconstitutional manner in which the Modi government has passed key bills by getting them declared as Money Bills (Representational Image)

Observing that expression of views that are different from the opinion of the government cannot be termed as seditious, the Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a PIL seeking action against National Conference president Farooq Abdullah over his comments on abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hemant Gupta rejected the plea and also imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on the petitioners for making such claims.

“Expression of views which are different from the opinion of the government cannot be termed as seditious,” the bench observed.

The top court was hearing a plea that referred to his statement on restoring Article 370, which gave special status to Jammu and Kashmir, and contended it clearly amounts to a seditious act and therefore he is liable to be punished under section 124-A of the IPC.

The petition filed by Rajat Sharma and Dr Neh Srivastava, both belonging to an organisation Vishwa Guru India Vision of Sardar Patel, alleged that the former chief minister is trying to “hand over” Kashmir to China and thus, he should be prosecuted for sedition.

“Mr Farooq Abdullah has committed an offence punishable under section 124-A of Indian Penal Code. As he has made the live statement that for restoring Article 370 he would take help of China which clearly amount to seditious act and therefore he is liable to be punished under section 124-A of the IPC,” the plea said.

The petitioners also referred to a statement made by BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra to claim that Abdullah is misleading the people of Jammu and Kashmir to join China for the restoration of Article 370 of the Constitution.

The Central Government had scrapped the special status granted to J&K under Article 370 on August 5, 2019, and divided the state into two Union Territories – Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh – with effect from October 31, 2019.

After the scrapping of Article 370, senior J&K leaders, including Farooq Abdullah, his son Omar Abdullah and PDP supremo and former CM Mehbooba Mufti, were put under house arrest.

Tags: article 370, Farooq Abdullah, Jammu and Kashmir, Pratirodh, sedition, Supreme Court

Continue Reading

Previous U.S., EU Impose Sanctions On Russia For Navalny Poisoning, Jailing
Next Amazon Issues Rare Apology After Complaints Over ‘Tandav’

More Stories

  • Featured

Wangchuk’s Resilience Shines Amid Detention And Legal Battles

2 days ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

A Grassland Gets A Lifeline, Offers A Lesson

2 days ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

Nations Struggle To Quit Fossil Fuels, Despite 30 Years Of Climate Talks

2 days ago Pratirodh Bureau

Recent Posts

  • Wangchuk’s Resilience Shines Amid Detention And Legal Battles
  • A Grassland Gets A Lifeline, Offers A Lesson
  • Nations Struggle To Quit Fossil Fuels, Despite 30 Years Of Climate Talks
  • Modi ‘Frightened’ Of Trump Over India-Russia Oil Deal: Rahul
  • The Misleading Trope Of Gay Marriages In India Being ‘Urban’, Elitist’
  • In The High Himalayas, Women Build A Shared Future For The Snow Leopard
  • TISS Students Face Police Action Over Event Commemorating G.N. Saibaba
  • How To Conduct Post-Atrocity Research – Key Insights From Field Practitioners
  • Groundwater More Crucial For Ganga’s Summer Flow Than Glaciers
  • IYC Demands Justice For Kerala Techie Anandu Aji In Delhi Protest
  • Why Do Oil Giants Invest In Green Energy?
  • This Village In TN Shows How Community-Led River Restoration Works
  • Haryana’s Narrow Redefinition Of Aravalli Hills Sparks Conservation Alarm
  • Machado’s Peace Prize: A Tradition Of Awarding Nobels For Complex Reasons
  • Why Heat Warnings Need To Get More Local
  • Kharge Blasts BJP’s ‘Manuwadi System’ Amid Rising Atrocities Against Dalits
  • The ‘One Piece’ Pirate Flag: The Global Emblem Of Gen Z Resistance
  • Ways In Which Tiger Conservation Safeguards India’s Water Future
  • ‘No Dignity For Dalits Under BJP-Led Govt’
  • In A Big Shift, Now Tibetan Buddhist Nuns Are Getting Advanced Degrees

Search

Main Links

  • Home
  • Newswires
  • Politics & Society
  • The New Feudals
  • World View
  • Arts And Aesthetics
  • For The Record
  • About Us

Related Stroy

  • Featured

Wangchuk’s Resilience Shines Amid Detention And Legal Battles

2 days ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

A Grassland Gets A Lifeline, Offers A Lesson

2 days ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

Nations Struggle To Quit Fossil Fuels, Despite 30 Years Of Climate Talks

2 days ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

Modi ‘Frightened’ Of Trump Over India-Russia Oil Deal: Rahul

3 days ago Pratirodh Bureau
  • Featured

The Misleading Trope Of Gay Marriages In India Being ‘Urban’, Elitist’

3 days ago Shalini

Recent Posts

  • Wangchuk’s Resilience Shines Amid Detention And Legal Battles
  • A Grassland Gets A Lifeline, Offers A Lesson
  • Nations Struggle To Quit Fossil Fuels, Despite 30 Years Of Climate Talks
  • Modi ‘Frightened’ Of Trump Over India-Russia Oil Deal: Rahul
  • The Misleading Trope Of Gay Marriages In India Being ‘Urban’, Elitist’
Copyright © All rights reserved. | CoverNews by AF themes.